>> The only way to avoid no deal is to vote for the deal.>> Amid all the Brexit chaos of the past two years, March 29 the day the UK is set to leave the EU, come what may, has been a fixed date in the diary. But now with less than 80 days to go, there are growing suggestions that might no longer be the case.
On Tuesday, parliament is expected to finally vote on and most likely reject Prime Minister May's Brexit deal. But on Friday, her loyal Foreign Minister and erstwhile remainer Jeremy Hunt warned lawmakers there might not be a better shade of Brexit to come.>> And what is more likely if this deal is rejected is that we have the risk of Brexit paralysis.
And when that happens know one knows what might happen. And the big risk and what people worry about is that we don't actually deliver what people voted for.>> What do we want?>> Brexit!>> When do we want it?>> Now!>> Other unnamed senior ministers told London's Evening Standard that a backlog of legislation could also delay the process beyond March 29.
Significantly, two of the biggest original leave campaign donors, Peter Hargreaves and Crispin Odey told Reuters, they fully expect Brexit to be abandoned all together. Hargreaves who donated over $4 million said he had totally given up on it, because of the deadlock in parliament. With the prospect of a disorderly or no Brexit on the horizon, opposition Labour Leader Jeremy Corbin is pushing his own idea for what should happen next.
>> If the government cannot pass its most important legislation, then there must be a general election at the earliest opportunity. A government that cannot get its business through the House of Commons is no government at all.>> So we'll take three questions and then Jeremy->> If Corbin got his way, any new government of whatever shade would then need time to renegotiate the terms of the withdrawal agreement with the EU.
That would almost certainly delay Brexit passed the current but receding March 29 deadline.