FIRST AIRED: April 3, 2017

Nice work! Enjoy the show!


You’re busy. We get it.

Stay on top of the news with our Editor’s Picks newsletter.

US Edition
Intl. Edition
Unsubscribe at any time. One click, it’s gone.

Thanks for signing up!



>> And I will ultimately vote against Judge Gorsuch's nomination today.>> Democrats Monday securing enough support in the US Senate to break with longstanding tradition, and for the first time ever attempt to filibuster a Supreme Court nominee. And that could trigger a dramatic rewriting of Senate rules, dubbed the nuclear option.
>> We're headied to a world where you don't need one person from the other side to pick a judge. And what does that mean? That means the judges are going to be more ideological, not less.>> A Democratic filibuster would require a 60 vote majority in the 100 member Senate to appoint a justice, and Republicans have just 52 seats in the chamber.
GOP Senate Leader Mitch McConnell has said that in that case, he plans to change the rules, allowing a simple majority vote to affirm US President Donald Trump's Supreme Court nominee, Neil Gorsuch. Lawrence Hurley covers the Supreme Court for Reuters.>> And the thing with the Democrats is they basically don't have a winning hand here, because whatever happens, Gorsuch is gonna get confirmed.
The issue is how difficult they make it for the Republicans, how much they can put off Trump having a big win, probably his real first significant win since he became president, to get his own Supreme Court justice on the court.>> The drama expected to unfold this week after a contentious Senate Judiciary Committee Monday voted along party lines to advance Gorsuch's nomination.
>> This nominee that we're voting on today is a judge's judge. He's a picture of the kind of justice we should have on the Supreme Court.>> Unfortunately, based on Judge Gorsuch's record at the Department of Justice, his tenure on the bench, his appearance before the Senate, and his written questions for the record, I cannot support this nomination.
>> Prior court nominees received enough support from both parties to win more than 60 votes in the senate, making a filibuster moot, or they faced a minority party unwilling to invoke it. Democrats claim the big break in Senate tradition was last year, led by Republicans who refused to even hold a hearing for President Barack Obama's nominee, Merrick Garland.
If Mitch McConnell invokes the nuclear option, Trump's nominee could be confirmed by the narrowest majority for a Supreme Court justice since Clarence Thomas, who squeaked past with just 52 votes in 1991 after Democrats declined to filibuster.